The Aral Sea and its Fishery
A project report
From Kattegat to Aral Sea –
a fishery project
The Danish Society for a
Living Sea, June 1998
PART 1
Preface
This report is based on the concrete
experiences we have had in working with the Aral Sea since 1991,
and hence we have a personal engagement in several of the
problems, the report should describe. The knowledge founding the
sections on natural- and cultural history has been gathered during
the same period, using among other sources, the articles and
reports describing the Aral Sea and the life that has been and
still is conducted in the area around the sea. The vast amount of
information available has been confronted with the factual
circumstances, as we have encountered them, and with the numerous
discussions we have had with the people, we have been working with,
in Denmark and in Kazakstan.
The purpose of this report is to formulate
the leitmotifs in the fishery- and development project "From
Kattegat to Aral Sea - a fishery project", and it is an
attempt to introduce light and shade into the many journalistic
and scientific articles and reports that have been written on the
Aral Sea. The journalistic-scientific manifold of information on
the Aral Sea and the people living by and with it, might seem
incomprehensible and difficult to take in a general view of, among
other reasons because the origin of much data is to be found in
the Soviet history and science. Along the way we have had to
revise our knowledge on a number of factual particulars, but it is
not our aim, however, to archaeologically cross check the existing
reports and articles in order to create a new and better
hermeneutic summary of the picture, they may describe. Instead, we
have treated the statistic and scientific information as elements
in a larger story, concerning real people and a real sea (still
alive!). If we have cross checked our information, it should
therefore be thus understood: Our accumulated experience is a web
of work, travelling and reading, continuously intervening and
crossing each other.
Henrik Jøker Bjerre
Kurt Bertelsen Christensen
The circumstances causing
this report.
The Non Governmental organised (NGO) project
"From Kattegat to Aral Sea" (1996-1998) should in 1997
carry out a midway evaluation. The report contains a separate
section with the evaluation results . In this we saw the occasion
of meeting a need, so far unfulfilled - to promote the project
through a report that provides an overall view of the area, we are
dealing with, of the experiences we have had, and of the
perspectives of this project.
The purpose of the report is hence fourfold:
- To give a short introduction to the
recent history of Kazakstan and particularly of the Aral Sea.
- To create an overall view of the project
sequence, since it started out in mid 1994.
- To draw the perspectives of the project
in order to obtain a basis for the discussions on the question:
whether the project should be continued and extended till
2001.
- To discuss the sketch of a future project.
The report is motivated by the fact that the
Kazakstani and Danish partners at the present stage agree that the
project should be continued and possibly extended. For this
purpose, an expert evaluation is to be carried out throughout
1998. This analysis should clarify the conditions of a larger
three year project, beginning in mid 1999. The 1998-phase is also
intended to maintain the democratic development in the area and to
strengthen and enlarge the co-operation between Denmark and
Kazakstan in accordance with the NGO concept. The results of this
work are to be documented in a substantial "project document".
This document could motivate the continuation of the project, at
what level and in what shape this should happen, or it could
motivate the ending of the project.
In case the project is continued, the
investigation can form the project description as regards to
further applications to donors. If the project is closed, the
investigation serves two purposes:
- An extended evaluation of the project.
- A heightened understanding for the
closing of the project.
BACKGROUND
Kazakstan
Geography and demography: Covering an area
of more than 2,700,000 km2, Kazakstan is the largest of
the five Central Asian countries. Before Kazakstan gained its
independence in 1991, it was the second largest republic of the
USSR, counting 16 million inhabitants, 8 million of whom were
ethnic Kazak. Since 1991, the Russian and German population in
Kazakstan have decreased slightly, but the Kazak hasn't grown at
the same pace. From 1992-1994 the total population went down by
app. 200,000 and the emigration continues. The citizens of
Kazakstan are now termed "Kazakstani", while the ethnic
Kazak are termed "Kazak".
The larger country sides of Kazakstan in the
Northern and Western parts from the East coast of the Caspian Sea,
are barren step and semi deserts, and only in the far South East
we find the natural fertile part of the country, bordering China
and Mongolia and separated from them by the Altai mountains. In
the South East is situated the former capital of Almaty (in the
Russian era: Alma-Ata). Almaty now has close to 1,500,000
inhabitants, as opposed to 1,100,000 in 1991. In 1998, however,
Kazakstani powerful ruler Nursultan Nasarbaev appointed Akmola
(former Celinograd) new capital of Kazakstan. Akmola is situated
in the Central Northern part of the country, and in 1993 counted a
mere 277,000 inhabitants.
Abroad, Kazakstan is widely known especially
because of the Soviet nuclear testing area near Semipalatinsk, and
the Soviet, now Russian, central space agency Baikonur, situated
on the step near the Aral Sea, the drying out of which has caused
global concern and attention.
Agricultural production: Beginning already
in the inter-war period, an intense agricultural production was
established along the Syr Darya river, which - together with the
Southern river Amu Darya - supplies the Aral Sea with water. This
production consists mainly in wheat for bread, and barley for
animal fodder. Furthermore, a smaller production of corn, rice and
potatoes exists. The agriculture is completely dependent on the
water from the rivers, which is led to the fields through systems
of canals and river dams.
The production was structured in the USSR
era around big state collective farms, the so-called sovkozes.
This agricultural production and the cotton production in
Uzbekistan along the river Syr Darya, are the main reasons for the
serious problems of the Aral Sea.
In order to understand the situation of
Kazakstan today, it is important to note the following:
Before the area, we today know as Kazakstan,
was included in the Russian Empire and soon thereafter in the
USSR, it was inhabited by nomads. Unlike the Russians, who mainly
passed from a feudal system with towns and villages into socialism,
the Kazak passed from nomadic families, tribes and clans into the
collectivisation's of socialism. The collectivised Kazakstan was
largely not created by Kazaks, but by Russians and Germans a.o.
The present transition in Kazakstan from socialism to capitalism
is especially influenced by this previous history.
The Kazakstani, as inhabitants of a
multi-cultural state, do not decide the development in Kazakstan
today - the Kazak do. And now the Kazak with their nomadic
tradition have to decide how to create a civil society. To some
Western observers, the process in Russia and the Baltic countries
of subdividing the vast collective farms into smaller private
farms, is forwarded at low pace. But the Baltic can realistically
hope to regain their former property if their documentation is
valid, and we are likely to see something like that in Russia. The
Kazak have no property to claim, and therefore have to decide on a
national level, whether and how they want to conduct agricultural
production at all.
When analysts say they are somewhat
surprised that things haven't turned out worse than they have in
the former Soviet republics, there are many ways of explaining
this. In Kazakstan, one of the explanations is the strong
solidarity within families and tribes. No matter how big and how
much parted a family may be, there are indisputable obligations
between all its members. If one family member earns a good salary,
the whole family benefits from it. [This also goes for meat
production: the family members in the country see to it that the
family in town receives meat.]
The following shows something about the set
back in production. The wheat production has gone down from 20
million ton/year to less than 10 million t/year. Barley from 10
million t/year to 6 million t/year. In all, the crops have
undergone a set back of more than 50 %. The animal production
however, has not seen similar set backs. The country still counts
1,500,000 horses, 9,000,000 cattle, 35,000,000 sheep and goats and
around 40,000 camels. The set back in crops is explained by the
fact that Kazakstan no longer provides the USSR with wheat. The
relatively stable animal production is explained by the fact that
the meat has always been meant to go into the Kazakstani market.
The fishery, which mainly takes place in the
Caspian Sea, the Balhaz Lake and the many rivers, is also
undergoing alterations, even if not as vast as in agriculture.
Around 70,000 tons are caught a year.
To illustrate the general state of affairs,
one could also mention that the number of passengers on the
Kazakstani railways increased by 100,000 from 1991-1993, and has
continued to go up, while in the same period the amount of cargo
has gone down by 50 %, and continues to go down.
It is thus still an open question whether
the Kazak want to take over an agricultural production that can
provide more than the home market with crops etc., and it is also
an open question whether the Kazakstani, meaning mainly Russians,
want to do that and will be allowed to.
Foreign policy: The main interests in terms
of the foreign policy of Kazakstan concern Russia. In December
1991, Kazakstan was the last Soviet republic to be independent,
and the orientation towards Russia and even Europe is significant.
However, the foreign policy and the security policy of the new
republic are still to some extent dictated by the historical
relationships to China. The Kazak have often fought the Russians
in North, but the main conflicts have been with the Chinese in the
South. Still now, the Kazak consider China to be the most
important thread to their security, even if various agreements
have been negotiated with China first of all in trade business,
lately concerning Kazakstani oil, which is the most important
object of foreign investment in Kazakstan at present day.
Economy: The national currency is Tenge
which is exchanged by US $ by approximately 75 Tenge to $ 1. The
Kazakstani national economy has met a dramatic set back since
1991. In 1994, the national product per capita was $ 1,110.
Towards the end of 1995, a slight increase in economy took place,
and the national product is now expected to be approximately $
1,200 - $ 1,300 per capita.
The Aral Sea before 1960
The Aral Sea was fourth among the largest
lakes in the world, situated app. 600 km east of the Caspian Sea.
The borderline between Kazakstan in the North and Uzbekistan in
the South divides the Sea in the middle in a North-West/South-East
direction. The sea covered an area of app. 64,000 km2
with an average depth of 30m. In the deepest parts, the depths
reached 60 m. Through the island, now peninsula, Kok Aral, the
Aral Sea has a natural divide in two parts: the Southern Big Aral,
and the Northern Small Aral. The Small Aral then covered app.
13,000 km2.
The Aral Sea is a step/desert lake situated
in a strong continental climate, with a variation of temperature
from 40 degrees plus in the summer time to 30 degrees below zero
in the winter. The summer heat caused (and still causes) a vast
evaporation, and the evaporation was the reason for the good
climate around Aral before the drying out of the sea. The sea was
like a very big oasis in the desert. The water balance was
maintained because of the vast supply of water from the two rivers
Syr Darya and Amu Darya. The two rivers form the only water supply
running into the Aral Sea, and they both get their water from the
mountains in the East, and from the enormous areas they run
through. The river water is fresh with a salinity below 0.7 per
mille, while the water in the Aral Sea was brackish with a
salinity at app. 9 per mille. The salt in the Aral Sea was caused
partly by the vast evaporation, and partly by the fact that the
ground water in and around the Aral Sea is salted. (The salted
ground water might be explained by an apparent total dry out of
the lake, hundreds of years ago.) The lake shores were encircled
by tight forests of reed and rush, sometimes stretching several
kilometres into the sea. In the sea, a variety of species of fish
were found and caught, including species that only existed in the
Aral Sea, and among those the famous Aral Sturgeon. Around the sea
and in the river delta, big populations of Saika (an antelope),
wild boar, wolf, fox, musk rat, turkey, goose and duck were found,
and the wildlife had good conditions of living in the sparsely
populated areas.
The fishery in the Small Aral before 1960:
In the Northern part of the Small Aral is situated the port of
Aralsk, which, counting around 35,000 inhabitants, is the biggest
town close to Aral. As a port, Aralsk was a well functioning town
with a shipbuilding yard, fishery industry and ferry service. In
the ship yard, ships of 50-500 ton were build for cargo and
fishery on Aral. The Aralsk railway station is situated on the
track from Moscow to Tashkent and Almaty, which is the most
important railway connection in Central Asia. Cargo from the
railway used to be trans-shipped to cargo boats and shipped off
southwards to the port of Muynak in Karakalpakistan, Uzbekistan (a
region that was part of the Kazak area before the USSR and which
is therefore mainly inhabited by Kazak).
The fishery in the Aral Sea had an annual
catch of more than 50,000 ton of high quality fish. 13 different
species were caught, including carp, SANDART, sturgeon, catfish,
and a species of herring. Fishing was the most important
profession in the area, and the realisation of fish in the entire
Soviet Union meant a stable economical development around the Aral
Sea, which meant that it was relatively affluent, when compared to
the rest of the USSR. Since hunting, agriculture and live stock
breeding were also well functioning, the area was self-sufficient
in victuals, and through the realisation of fish, it was supplied
with energy and raw materials for a.o. the ship-building industry.
Around the Small Aral were situated 19
smaller and larger fishery communities. These were either
self-governing in collective societies (kolhozes) or attached to
the main fishery co-operative (sovhoz) in the area. While the
sovhozes were directly controlled by the state, the kolhozes were
more self-organised in electing leaders and choosing fields of
activity.
A kolhoz: Djambul kolhoz is situated app. 60
km west of Aralsk. 1,500 people used to live here. In the natural
harbour situated a few kilometers from the village, 12 big fishing
vessels were lying at anchor - and they still are, but now in the
desert sand. Djambul did not own these vessels, but a number of
smaller boats and barges. The fishery was, and still is, vital to
Djambul, since it - unlike in the villages near the Syr Darya at
the east coast of the sea - is impossible to conduct agriculture.
Besides the fishery, Djambul has a production of live stock,
mainly horses and camels. Some vegetables can be grown in the
small gardens within the areas of the individual houses. The
houses are encircled by fences protecting patios with gardens and
animals.
The kolhozes themselves took care of the
schooling, polio clinics were common, and in some cases even
smaller hospitals.
The fishing from the big vessels was
conducted at sea, and the fish was sold to the factory in Aralsk.
The crew on the vessels was from Djambul and elsewhere, but
besides this fishery, a small scale fishery took place, especially
in the winter time and in the early spring. In these periods, the
climate made it possible to keep the fish, and a special fishing
technique on ice was developed , using camels as tractive force
(in the severe winter, parts of Small Aral are covered by ice.)
The fish that wasn’t consumed locally, was sold to the fishery
industry in Aralsk. Fish was as important as meat in the
households at the Aral Sea.
A sovhoz: Aralrybprom ("The Aral Fish
Factory"), as - like numerous state co-operatives - founded
in the mid twenties. The state co-operatives became the most usual
forms of organisation of industry and trade in the USSR. The
sovhozes were characterised by the leadership of general directors
appointed from Moscow. This meant that the directors didn’t
necessarily have any connection to the area, where the
co-operative was situated, nor any specific knowledge about the
production performed. He could be from anywhere, and his
appointment was closely linked to his status at the present time.
In Aralsk, Aralrybprom was the largest
enterprise, employing several thousands, and forming an
indispensable basis of a number of villages, dependant on fishery.
Karateren is such a village in the river delta close to the shore,
counting around 2,000 inhabitants. The main occupation in the
village was fishery, which was controlled by Aralrybprom through
agreements with the village administration. The village elects its
own mayor (the Akim), but in Karateren as in similar villages, the
real power was in the hands of the local director of fishery.
In the central town of Aralsk, the power was
mainly centred around the general director of Aralrybprom, and
until the mid seventies it was a sign of progress to be appointed
general director of the co-operative. Since the collapse of the
fishery however, this appointment gradually transformed into a
signal of movement downwards in the hierarchy…
The Aral Sea after 1960
In the inter-war period, agricultural
production along the Syr Darya was prepared and initiated, with
tragic consequences to the Kazak nomadic culture. The Stalin
collectivisation programme struck the Kazak harshly, and it is
estimated that 1 million Kazak died or fled the area to move to
the countries south of Kazakstan.
The Kazak, who remained, did not have the
requested knowledge and tradition in agriculture, which is why
experts had to be brought from outside. In all, more than 10
million people were moved to Central Asia, many of them by force,
for political reasons, and the most of them to Kazakstan that
still now counts around 8 million non-Kazak.
After the Second World War, the wheat
production was dramatically increased, which was made possible
only by the digging of numerous canals and the building of dams
across the river. The canals were dug in very simple manners, by
simply digging the main and secondary canals directly in the sand.
None seemed to notice the importance of establishing pipes or at
least cementing the main canals. Draining the fields wasn’t a
subject either.
In the season, floodgates were closed, and
the water was led directly into the fields, a system which causes
a tremendous loss of water. Less than 10 % of the water taken in
was directly beneficial to the crop. The rest disappeared down the
sandy soil or evaporated.
In the early fifties, the increasing
isolation of the USSR made the great union consider it a strategic
aim to become self-sufficient in everything, including cotton and
victuals. To Kazakstan this meant increased focus in wheat
production for bread and vodka.
President Nikita Khrustjev (1953-1964) was
personally fascinated by an agriculture in no need of humus, and
which could be conducted directly on sandy soil, using only vast
supplies of water. Kazakstan and Uzbekistan both covered vast
areas of sandy soil, and through both republics ran rivers with
immense amounts of water. A programme was launched to make the
USSR self-sufficient in wheat and cotton. Cotton needs a warm
climate, which is why the cotton production was placed in
Uzbekistan along the banks of the Amu Darya. Production of wheat,
barley, millet and rice was mainly placed along the Syr Darya
river in Kazakstan.
From the mid fifties and up until the late
eighties, the total supply of water from the two rivers to the
Aral Sea, dropped from 25 km3/year to less than 5 km3/year. 20 km3
is a lot of water… To compare, it is worth noticing that Denmark
with its 5 million inhabitants, in households, industry and
agriculture uses 0.915 km3 a year (1995). This enormous set back
in water supply had catastrophic consequences to the Aral Sea.
Beginning in the early sixties, dramatic changes in the catches
took place, both in amounts and in the composition of the catches.
Shallow areas that used to be sailing water, now had to be avoided.
Fishing communities started digging fairways for the vessels
deeper, and in consequence of the decreasing water levels,
artificial canals were dug out.
But the shore kept receding, the vessels
were stranded in the shallow water, and today they are lying
helplessly in the desert that replaced the sea, many places more
than 60 km away from the present shore. The salinity kept
increasing, and the fishery went down until it finally seized
existing completely.
In 1975, fishing stopped in the Small
Aral, and Aralsk was a port without a port. The ferry service
stopped, the ground water salinity increased, hunting went down,
and the climate started undergoing changes, among other reasons
because the big forests of reed and rush disappeared, when the
water drew back.
In order to maintain the employment in
fishing industry, frozen fish was introduced from other parts of
the USSR, such as the Baltic Sea, the White Sea, and the Pacific
Ocean. This supply stopped with the Kazakstani independence in
1991.
In the years following 1975, a major "aid"-programme
directed by the Kazak vice-minister Tairov aimed at supporting the
families around Aral in moving them from the villages in the new
desert along the former coast-line. The fishermen were moved to
places like Balkhas, Kapchagay, Alakol, Zaysan, all lakes situated
1000-1500 km east of Aral. Others were moved west to the Caspian
Sea, and the rest - app. 50 % of a total of 10-15,000 people -
were settled in the state collective farms along the Syr Darya.
17 fishery communities in the Small Aral
region were abandoned. Cemeteries - an important part of the local
culture through generations - were abandoned, and even the houses
in many villages disappeared rapidly because of the new climate
with sandstorms of increasing power and frequency.
The Aral Region was declared an "ecological
zone", which (to Europeans paradoxically) means an area of
ecological disaster, and everybody was offered an "ecological
disaster addition" to the salary, pension etc. Since 1991,
the disaster "bonus" - consisting in products and money
- has been the responsibility of the new government in Almaty, but
the aid is rarely paid, and since Aralsk has no significant
circulation of money, salaries in Aralsk are very unstable. Only
the civil servants in the city council and the police receive
fairly stable payments.
Until 1975 the area was relatively affluent,
but since then the Aralsk region has been dependent on emergency
aid, and today the UN considers the region to be the poorest
region in Kazakstan. The little income that reaches the area is
mainly from the salt production and from international aid
programmes. The weak money economy has caused problems for
schooling and social services. The old people of Aralsk frequently
gather on the city council square to press the administration for
their pensions.
The visible initiatives are mainly small
scale trading in the streets, in the market and in cafés. The
main activity in Aralsk seems to be moving around less and less
values, since the money, resources or initiatives needed to
attract values from other places do not exist. Measured by amounts,
there are more goods in the market in Aralsk now than in 1991, but
these goods do not represent increased affluence, on the contrary
- since the goods are of a low quality, usually imported from
China or Iran.
The severely reduced fishery production
(from 20,000 t/year to 1,500 t/year) is still controlled from
above, but now mainly by in-effective leaders, who do not decide
where, when and how fishing is conducted. The little fishery that
still exists, is conducted in wintertime and in the early spring,
because the cold is needed to keep the fish, and when it is to be
sold. The fishery takes place in small lakes east of Aral and in
the Syr Darya river itself. In the spring and autumn, some fishing
brigades are situated at the Balkhas Lake and at other lakes in
eastern Kazakstan. Recently, however, this possibility has also
been denied the Aral fishermen, since authorities in for instance
Balkhas have denied them access to the lake.
The catches are not realised for money, but
changed to flour, gasoline, margarine etc. (in October 1996, the
fishermen told us that they hadn’t seen actual money as salary
since 1993). Sometimes the fishermen receive provisions for their
work, sometimes nothing. The main buyer of the fish is the space
agency centre Baikonur, where 70,000 Russian military troops and
workers are situated. From Baikonur gasoline, engines and
margarine are offered in exchange of the fish. Some fish is smoked
and sold on the railway track. On this railway, which is very
important to the town, ordinary people are selling dried and
smoked fish and a variety of other products. The train trades mean
that a considerable amount of women and children on a daily basis
are trying to realise their goods to travellers with a limited
ability to buy. In this respect you could say that the families
within the previous six years have had to concentrate less on
schooling and households, and seem to be passing into a situation
where the men "organise" the goods, and the women and
children are trying to realise them. It is a common joke in
Kazakstan that the independence in 1991 really demarked the "independence
from salary": since then it has been up to each individual to
earn enough to survive.
Aralsk and Little Aral today: It should be
beyond discussion that the negative development described above,
should be changed. One of the ways to change direction is to
create a focus on the natural and human resources that do exist in
the area:
The area is rich on salt that can be
exported, and the salt industry provides a lot of employment.
But salt is a cheap product and therefore
doesn’t bring much money to the area. Furthermore, the salt is
an obvious consequence of the disaster that struck the area with
the drying of the sea. An increase in value might be forwarded by
processing the salt. The salt that is sold at present time, is
still dirty and very dark.
An ambitious project wants to build a dam
between Small and Big Aral. The project has been coming up for
several years, and in an Aral Sea conference held in Paris in June
1994, the UN and the World Bank reserved the money needed to
undertake the building of the dam - on certain conditions that
apparently haven’t yet been fulfilled. The budget amounts to $
42 million, and the dam is to be build across a natural flow of
water from north to south, cutting off the Big Aral from the water
supply of the Syr Darya. Today, a deep canal leads the water of
Syr Darya more or less directly into the Big Aral. The dam, a vast
21 km cement construction with sluices, is to be supported with
50-70 km of dikes.
The project has the special attention of the
mayor of Aralsk. Several times he has taken the initiative to
close the canal with dirt, sand and reed and rush. Today the mayor
is keeping 20-30 excavators and trucks busy, working on the
provisional dam. In the season of cultivation and growing inside
the country, the dam holds tight, and the water level in Small
Aral is increasing, which lowers the salinity. During autumn and
winter, the water level is rapidly increasing, and in the spring,
when huge amounts of melting water reach the Aral Sea, the dam
collapses, and the construction can start over. But this work has
shown that the project is viable, and that the fresh water quickly
influences the situation in Small Aral.
The dam should ensure that the water from
Syr Darya doesn’t run directly through Small Aral and into Big
Aral, but stays in the north to make the Small Aral return to a
state of fresh or brackish water, like before 1975. Small Aral as
a fresh water lake would mean an area of around 10,000 km2, which
means that the port in Aralsk would be reactivated, and that other
natural harbours could again be used. The fresh water would also
further a rise of the nature that existed, before the salt
destroyed the fresh water fauna and flora in and around the sea.
This again would improve the climate in the Aralsk Region. The dam
provides employment in itself, and in order to even transport
construction material to the sea, new roads much be build and
existing improved, especially in the south eastern parts. An
improved infra structure at the delta would further the
possibilities of establishing a fishery on flounder in the Big
Aral, since it would facilitate the transport of boats, trucks and
fish to and from Aralsk. And the fishery on flounder is the very
heart of this NGO-project:
|